↓ Skip to main content

Measuring and Predicting Patient Dissatisfaction after Anterior Urethroplasty Using Patient Reported Outcomes Measures

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Urology, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Measuring and Predicting Patient Dissatisfaction after Anterior Urethroplasty Using Patient Reported Outcomes Measures
Published in
The Journal of Urology, February 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.juro.2016.01.117
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Subjective measures of success after urethroplasty have become increasingly valuable in postoperative monitoring. The purpose of this study was to examine patient-reported satisfaction following anterior urethroplasty using objective measures as a proxy for success. Men ≥18 years old with urethral strictures undergoing urethroplasty were prospectively enrolled in a longitudinal, multi-institutional urethroplasty outcomes database. Pre- and postoperative assessment included questionnaires to assess lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), pain, satisfaction, and sexual health. Analyses, controlling for stricture recurrence (defined as the inability to traverse the reconstructed urethra with a flexible cystoscope), were performed to determine independent predictors of dissatisfaction. Of 433 patients, we found a high rate of overall postoperative satisfaction (89.4%) and a high rate of men who would have chosen the operation again (82.8%) at a mean follow-up time of 14 months. Men with cystoscopic recurrence were more likely to report dissatisfaction (OR 4.96 (95% CI 2.07 - 11.90) and men reporting dissatisfaction had significantly worse uroflowmetry measures (all p < 0.02). Controlling for recurrence, multivariate analysis revealed that presence of pain (urethra OR 1.71 (1.05 - 2.77), bladder OR 2.74 (1.12 - 6.69)), postoperative decrease in sexual activity (OR 4.36 (2.07 - 11.90)) and persistent LUTS (e.g. strain to urinate; OR 3.23 (1.74 - 6.01)) were independent predictors of dissatisfaction. Overall satisfaction after anterior urethroplasty is high and traditional measures of surgical success strongly correlate with satisfaction. However, independent of the anatomic appearance of the reconstructed urethra, postoperative pain, sexual dysfunction and persistence LUTS were predictors for patient dissatisfaction.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Italy 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Unknown 57 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 14%
Student > Postgraduate 8 14%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Researcher 5 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 7%
Other 11 19%
Unknown 17 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 53%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 22 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2016.
All research outputs
#11,335,109
of 34,350,842 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Urology
#8,230
of 21,939 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,317
of 336,795 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Urology
#144
of 473 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,350,842 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,939 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,795 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 473 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.