You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
間質性肺炎終末期の呼吸困難緩和におけるモルヒネ持続皮下注射の有用性の検討
|
---|---|
Published in |
The Journal of the Japan Society for Respiratory Care and Rehabilitation, December 2007
|
DOI | 10.15032/jsrcr.17.3_273 |
Authors |
太田 智奈美, 江田 清一郎, 折井 恭子 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2020.
All research outputs
#20,667,544
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of the Japan Society for Respiratory Care and Rehabilitation
#81
of 101 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,454
of 166,891 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of the Japan Society for Respiratory Care and Rehabilitation
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 101 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,891 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them