↓ Skip to main content

Relationships of Cambrian Arachnata and the systematic position of Trilobita

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Paleontology, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
12 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Relationships of Cambrian Arachnata and the systematic position of Trilobita
Published in
Journal of Paleontology, May 2016
DOI 10.1017/s0022336000027761
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 7%
Argentina 3 7%
Germany 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 33 80%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 27%
Researcher 9 22%
Student > Postgraduate 6 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 7%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 4 10%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 19 46%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 32%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Unknown 7 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2025.
All research outputs
#7,756,853
of 23,578,176 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Paleontology
#596
of 1,569 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,487
of 334,850 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Paleontology
#80
of 375 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,578,176 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,569 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,850 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 375 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.