↓ Skip to main content

Striatal function in relation to negative symptoms in schizophrenia

Overview of attention for article published in Psychological Medicine, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Striatal function in relation to negative symptoms in schizophrenia
Published in
Psychological Medicine, July 2011
DOI 10.1017/s003329171100119x
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Previous studies have suggested that motivational aspects of executive functioning, which may be disrupted in schizophrenia patients with negative symptoms, are mediated in part by the striatum. Negative symptoms have been linked to impaired recruitment of both the striatum and the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). Here we tested the hypothesis that negative symptoms are associated primarily with striatal dysfunction, using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI).

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 4%
Netherlands 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 74 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 22%
Student > Master 11 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 13%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 6%
Other 14 18%
Unknown 14 18%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 31 39%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 16%
Neuroscience 7 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Engineering 2 3%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 19 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2015.
All research outputs
#15,745,949
of 25,708,267 outputs
Outputs from Psychological Medicine
#4,056
of 5,470 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,617
of 128,459 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychological Medicine
#31
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,708,267 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,470 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 128,459 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.