↓ Skip to main content

Persistent currents in a graphene ring with armchair edges

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Persistent currents in a graphene ring with armchair edges
Published in
Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, May 2012
DOI 10.1088/0953-8984/24/24/245304
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

A graphene nanoribbon with armchair edges is known to have no edge state. However, if the nanoribbon is in the quantum spin Hall state, then there must be helical edge states. By folding a graphene ribbon into a ring and threading it by a magnetic flux, we study the persistent charge and spin currents in the tight-binding limit. It is found that, for a broad ribbon, the edge spin current approaches a finite value independent of the radius of the ring. For a narrow ribbon, inter-edge coupling between the edge states could open the Dirac gap and reduce the overall persistent currents. Furthermore, by enhancing the Rashba coupling, we find that the persistent spin current gradually reduces to zero at a critical value beyond which the graphene is no longer a quantum spin Hall insulator.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 4%
India 1 4%
Spain 1 4%
China 1 4%
Unknown 24 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 32%
Student > Master 5 18%
Researcher 5 18%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 11%
Other 2 7%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 1 4%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 20 71%
Engineering 3 11%
Mathematics 1 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 4%
Chemistry 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 7%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2012.
All research outputs
#7,605,073
of 28,841,988 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter
#506
of 6,189 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,162
of 185,984 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter
#21
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,841,988 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,189 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 185,984 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.