↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
5 patents

Readers on

mendeley
164 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Segmentation of MR images via discriminative dictionary learning and sparse coding: Application to hippocampus labeling
Published in
NeuroImage, March 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.02.069
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tong Tong, Robin Wolz, Pierrick Coupé, Joseph V. Hajnal, Daniel Rueckert, The Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 164 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
United Kingdom 3 2%
France 2 1%
China 2 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 148 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 27%
Researcher 32 20%
Student > Master 21 13%
Professor 15 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Other 23 14%
Unknown 21 13%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 54 33%
Engineering 35 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 5%
Neuroscience 9 5%
Other 13 8%
Unknown 31 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2022.
All research outputs
#7,384,212
of 33,957,889 outputs
Outputs from NeuroImage
#4,776
of 13,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,100
of 243,990 outputs
Outputs of similar age from NeuroImage
#55
of 198 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,957,889 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,538 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,990 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 198 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.