↓ Skip to main content

Assessing Individual Differences in Experiential (Intuitive) and Rational (Analytical) Cognitive Styles

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Selection & Assessment, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
108 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Assessing Individual Differences in Experiential (Intuitive) and Rational (Analytical) Cognitive Styles
Published in
International Journal of Selection & Assessment, May 2013
DOI 10.1111/ijsa.12030
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Portugal 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Unknown 104 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 19%
Student > Master 17 16%
Student > Bachelor 10 9%
Researcher 8 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 24 22%
Unknown 23 21%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 25 23%
Business, Management and Accounting 22 20%
Social Sciences 17 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 3%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 23 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2021.
All research outputs
#27,726,607
of 34,360,257 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Selection & Assessment
#402
of 534 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#188,847
of 241,042 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Selection & Assessment
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,360,257 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 534 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,042 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.