↓ Skip to main content

Case‐control study of cases of bovine spongiform encephalopathy born after July 31, 1996 (BARB cases) in Great Britain

Overview of attention for article published in Veterinary Record: Journal of the British Veterinary Association, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Case‐control study of cases of bovine spongiform encephalopathy born after July 31, 1996 (BARB cases) in Great Britain
Published in
Veterinary Record: Journal of the British Veterinary Association, April 2012
DOI 10.1136/vr.100097
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

This paper reports the results of a case-control study of the bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) cases born in Great Britain after the statutory reinforcement of the ban (BARB) on the feeding of mammalian-derived meat and bone meal on 31 July 1996. A total of 499 suspect clinical cases of BSE, born after 31 July 1996, and reported negative by July 31, 1996 and were compared with the set of 164 confirmed Great BARB cases in Great Britain detected by both passive and active surveillance. Animal-level risk factors (age and type of feed offered) and herd-level risk factors (herd size and type, number of prereinforced feed ban BSE cases born on the holding, the presence of other domestic species and waste management) were obtained for the analysis. BARB cases were 2.56 times (95 per cent CI 1.29 to 5.07) more likely to be exposed to homemix or a combination of homemix and proprietary feeds were 0.59 times (95 per cent CI 0.50 to 0.69) as less likely to be exposed to the unit increases in the number of prereinforced feed ban BSE cases diagnosed on the natal holding. A supplementary spatial analysis of these cases revealed three areas of excess BARB density: Northwest and Southwest of Wales and Northeast of Scotland.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 6%
Unknown 34 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 25%
Professor 5 14%
Student > Master 3 8%
Other 2 6%
Lecturer 2 6%
Other 7 19%
Unknown 8 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 9 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Unknown 10 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2013.
All research outputs
#9,597,966
of 34,358,242 outputs
Outputs from Veterinary Record: Journal of the British Veterinary Association
#1,706
of 8,285 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,185
of 208,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Veterinary Record: Journal of the British Veterinary Association
#7
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,358,242 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,285 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,967 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.