↓ Skip to main content

Hunger and Technology

Overview of attention for article published in Food and Nutrition Bulletin, April 1981
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Hunger and Technology
Published in
Food and Nutrition Bulletin, April 1981
DOI 10.1177/156482658100300209
Authors

H.C. Hou

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2026.
All research outputs
#9,515,597
of 27,788,803 outputs
Outputs from Food and Nutrition Bulletin
#429
of 965 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,129
of 7,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Food and Nutrition Bulletin
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,788,803 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 965 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 7,767 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them