↓ Skip to main content

Chemistry of Ni2+ in Urease: Sensing, Trafficking, and Catalysis

Overview of attention for article published in Accounts of Chemical Research, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
173 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Chemistry of Ni2+ in Urease: Sensing, Trafficking, and Catalysis
Published in
Accounts of Chemical Research, May 2011
DOI 10.1021/ar200041k
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Transition metals are both essential to enzymatic catalysis and limited in environmental availability. These two biological facts have together driven organisms to evolve mechanisms for selective metal ion sensing and utilization. Changes in metal ion concentrations are perceived by metal-dependent transcription factors and transduced into appropriate cellular responses, which regulate the machineries of competitive metal ion homeostasis and metallo-enzyme activation. The intrinsic toxicity of the majority of metal ions further creates a need for regulated intracellular trafficking, which is carried out by specific chaperones. The Ni(2+)-dependent urease enzymatic system serves as a paradigm for studying the strategies that cells use to handle an essential, yet toxic, metal ion. Although the discovery of urease as the first biological system for which nickel is essential for activity dates to 1975, the rationale for Ni(2+) selection, as well as the cascade of events involving metal-dependent gene regulation and protein-protein interactions leading to enzyme activation, have yet to be fully unraveled. The past 14 years since the Account by Hausinger and co-workers (Karplus, P. A.; Pearson, M. A.; Hausinger, R. P. Acc. Chem. Res. 1997, 30, 330-337) have witnessed impressive achievements in the understanding of the biological chemistry of Ni(2+) in the urease system. In our Account, we discuss more recent advances in the comprehension of the specific role of Ni(2+) in the catalysis and the interplay between Ni(2+) and other metal ions, such as Zn(2+) and Fe(2+), in the metal-dependent enzyme activity. Our discussion focuses on work carried out in our laboratory. In particular, the structural features of the enzyme bound to inhibitors, substrate analogues, and transition state or intermediate analogues have shed light on the catalytic mechanism. Structural and functional information has been correlated to understand the Ni(2+) sensing effected by NikR, a nickel-dependent transcription factor. The urease activation process, involving insertion of Ni(2+) into the urease active site, has been in part dissected and analyzed through the investigation of the molecular properties of the accessory proteins UreD, UreF, and UreG. The intracellular trafficking of Ni(2+) has been rationalized through a deeper understanding of the structural and metal-binding properties of the metallo-chaperone UreE. All the while, a number of key general concepts have been revealed and developed. These include an understanding of (i) the overall ancillary role of Zn(2+) in nickel metabolism, (ii) the intrinsically disordered nature of the GTPase responsible for coupling the energy consumption to the carbon dioxide requirement for the urease activation process, and (iii) the role of the accessory proteins regulating this GTPase activity.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 173 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 171 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 23%
Student > Bachelor 19 11%
Student > Master 19 11%
Researcher 10 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Other 24 14%
Unknown 54 31%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 44 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 12%
Engineering 7 4%
Environmental Science 6 3%
Other 12 7%
Unknown 60 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2023.
All research outputs
#2,136,185
of 26,868,050 outputs
Outputs from Accounts of Chemical Research
#191
of 4,218 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,926
of 124,260 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Accounts of Chemical Research
#2
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,868,050 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,218 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 124,260 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.