↓ Skip to main content

Reply to Adolf and Fried: Conditional equivalence and imperatives for person-level science

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
bluesky
1 Bluesky user

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Reply to Adolf and Fried: Conditional equivalence and imperatives for person-level science
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, March 2019
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1820221116
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 25%
Professor 3 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 15%
Student > Master 2 10%
Other 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 5 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 8 40%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 10%
Neuroscience 2 10%
Engineering 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2020.
All research outputs
#22,204,623
of 34,560,573 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#104,872
of 119,182 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#230,767
of 392,524 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#848
of 1,027 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,560,573 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 119,182 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.1. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 392,524 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,027 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.