↓ Skip to main content

Assessing individual heterogeneity using model selection criteria: how many mixture components in capture–recapture models?

Overview of attention for article published in Methods in Ecology and Evolution, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
158 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Assessing individual heterogeneity using model selection criteria: how many mixture components in capture–recapture models?
Published in
Methods in Ecology and Evolution, January 2012
DOI 10.1111/j.2041-210x.2011.00175.x
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 158 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 4 3%
United Kingdom 2 1%
France 2 1%
Brazil 2 1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 139 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 35 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 19%
Student > Master 22 14%
Student > Bachelor 14 9%
Other 13 8%
Other 27 17%
Unknown 17 11%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 88 56%
Environmental Science 34 22%
Mathematics 4 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 2%
Social Sciences 2 1%
Other 5 3%
Unknown 22 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2012.
All research outputs
#15,241,259
of 22,661,413 outputs
Outputs from Methods in Ecology and Evolution
#2,087
of 2,193 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,968
of 246,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in Ecology and Evolution
#24
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,661,413 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,193 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.1. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,023 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.