↓ Skip to main content

Garcinia mangostana L.: a phytochemical and pharmacological review

Overview of attention for article published in Phytotherapy Research, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
patent
7 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
402 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Garcinia mangostana L.: a phytochemical and pharmacological review
Published in
Phytotherapy Research, January 2009
DOI 10.1002/ptr.2730
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Garcinia mangostana L. (mangosteen, Clusiaceae) has a long history of use as a medical plant, mostly in Southeast Asia. This is a review of the phytochemistry and pharmacology of mangosteen. Traditionally mangosteen is famous for its antiinflammatory properties and is used in the treatment of skin infections and wounds. Other applications include the therapy of various conditions such as dysentery, different urinary disorders, cystitis and gonorrhoea. This review highlights the development of this botanical drug into a widely used nutraceutical. Products derived from G. mangostana are now distributed increasingly all over the world. This has given rise to a concomitant increase in research on the phytochemical constituents and biological activity of mangosteen. Central to the biological activity of the species are xanthones which are reviewed in detail. A comprehensive assessment of the biological activities of individual xanthones as well as extracts of G. mangostana is included. In addition, its potential in terms of developing novel drug leads is assessed. Products containing its fruits are now sold widely as 'liquid botanical supplements', but evidence for the health benefits of these products is still lacking. As shown here, a serious weakness in our knowledge is the lack of clinical data and it is not yet clear to what extent the findings about pharmacological activities are of potential clinical relevance.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 402 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Unknown 399 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 61 15%
Student > Master 53 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 6%
Student > Postgraduate 17 4%
Researcher 16 4%
Other 65 16%
Unknown 167 42%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 47 12%
Chemistry 42 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 36 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 36 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 6%
Other 46 11%
Unknown 172 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2025.
All research outputs
#1,895,185
of 30,096,795 outputs
Outputs from Phytotherapy Research
#377
of 3,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,519
of 214,916 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Phytotherapy Research
#7
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 30,096,795 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,757 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 214,916 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.