↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Cu(I)/O2 Chemistry Using a β-Diketiminate Supporting Ligand Derived from N,N-Dimethylhydrazine: A [Cu3O2]3+ Complex with Novel Reactivity
Published in
Inorganic Chemistry, January 2012
DOI 10.1021/ic202214c
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

A Cu(I) complex, LCu(CH(3)CN), was prepared and characterized, where L(-) is a sterically unencumbered β-diketiminate ligand, the deprotonated version of 4-(2,2-dimethylhydrazino)dimethylhydrazone-3-penten-2-one (LH). Analysis of FTIR spectra of the products of the reaction of LCu(CH(3)CN) with CO indicate that L(-) is strongly electron donating, and support an equilibrium in solution between monomeric and dimeric forms with terminal and bridging CO ligands, respectively. Low temperature oxygenation of LCu(CH(3)CN) generated a bis(μ-oxo)tricopper complex with a S = 1 [Cu(3)O(2)](3+) core that was identified on the basis of UV-vis (λ(max) (ε, M(-1) cm(-1) per Cu) = 328 (10700), 420 (1500), 590 (835) nm) and X-band electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy (Δm(s) = 2 transition at 1500 G), electrospray ionization (ESI) mass spectrometry, and spectrophotometric titration (0.35(2) equiv of O(2) per copper atom), magnetic susceptibility (μ(eff) = 2.8(1) BM), and H(2)O(2) detection experiments (no H(2)O(2) evolved upon acidification). Unlike other reported variants supported by neutral N-donor ligands, L(3)Cu(3)O(2) is not reduced by ferrocene, does not abstract H-atoms from phenols or 1,2-dihydroanthracene, oxidizes PPh(3) to Ph(3)P═O, and generates carbonate species upon exposure to CO(2). This unique reactivity for a [Cu(3)O(2)](3+) complex may be traced to the anionic charge and strong electron donating characteristics of L(-).

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
France 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 47 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 47%
Student > Bachelor 6 12%
Researcher 4 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 8%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 7 14%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 39 80%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Unspecified 1 2%
Unknown 7 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2012.
All research outputs
#15,241,259
of 22,661,413 outputs
Outputs from Inorganic Chemistry
#13,640
of 21,510 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,968
of 246,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Inorganic Chemistry
#69
of 381 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,661,413 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,510 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,023 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 381 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.