↓ Skip to main content

HIV-1 reverse transcriptase complex with DNA and nevirapine reveals non-nucleoside inhibition mechanism

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Structural & Molecular Biology, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
136 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
HIV-1 reverse transcriptase complex with DNA and nevirapine reveals non-nucleoside inhibition mechanism
Published in
Nature Structural & Molecular Biology, January 2012
DOI 10.1038/nsmb.2223
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Combinations of nucleoside and non-nucleoside inhibitors (NNRTIs) of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase (RT) are widely used in anti-AIDS therapies. Five NNRTIs, including nevirapine, are clinical drugs; however, the molecular mechanism of inhibition by NNRTIs is not clear. We determined the crystal structures of RT-DNA-nevirapine, RT-DNA, and RT-DNA-AZT-triphosphate complexes at 2.85-, 2.70- and 2.80-Å resolution, respectively. The RT-DNA complex in the crystal could bind nevirapine or AZT-triphosphate but not both. Binding of nevirapine led to opening of the NNRTI-binding pocket. The pocket formation caused shifting of the 3' end of the DNA primer by ~5.5 Å away from its polymerase active site position. Nucleic acid interactions with fingers and palm subdomains were reduced, the dNTP-binding pocket was distorted and the thumb opened up. The structures elucidate complementary roles of nucleoside and non-nucleoside inhibitors in inhibiting RT.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 6 4%
Italy 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 128 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 18%
Researcher 21 15%
Student > Bachelor 19 14%
Student > Master 17 13%
Student > Postgraduate 8 6%
Other 15 11%
Unknown 32 24%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 27 20%
Chemistry 25 18%
Physics and Astronomy 4 3%
Engineering 4 3%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 38 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2020.
All research outputs
#9,306,010
of 31,634,113 outputs
Outputs from Nature Structural & Molecular Biology
#2,341
of 3,867 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,504
of 285,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Structural & Molecular Biology
#18
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,634,113 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,867 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.8. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,766 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.