↓ Skip to main content

PRENESTING USE OF INTERTIDAL HABITATS BY PIPING PLOVERS ON SOUTH MONOMOY ISLAND, MASSACHUSETTS

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Wildlife Management, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
PRENESTING USE OF INTERTIDAL HABITATS BY PIPING PLOVERS ON SOUTH MONOMOY ISLAND, MASSACHUSETTS
Published in
Journal of Wildlife Management, December 2010
DOI 10.2193/0022-541x(2005)69[1731:puoihb]2.0.co;2
Authors

JAMES D. FRASER, SHANNON E. KEANE, P. A. BUCKLEY

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 4%
Unknown 25 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 38%
Researcher 5 19%
Other 2 8%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 4%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 4 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 62%
Environmental Science 6 23%
Unknown 4 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2023.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Wildlife Management
#966
of 2,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,692
of 191,076 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Wildlife Management
#122
of 352 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,076 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 352 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.