| Title |
Changes in prescribing for terminal care patients in general practice, hospital and hospice over a five-year period.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, November 1987
|
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
W D Rees |
| Abstract |
Differences in prescribing between 1981 and 1986 were examined for 100 terminal care patients admitted to a city hospice in each year. Prescribing before and after the patients were admitted to the hospice was also compared for the two years. Between 1981 and 1986 there was a large increase in the number of patients receiving morphine sulphate tablets and a reduction in the numbers receiving Brompton's mixture and other unsuitable analgesics both before and after admission. Contrary to critical opinion, general practitioners showed more acceptable prescribing patterns in both years than hospital doctors. In the hospice more patients received non-narcotic analgesics and parenteral diamorphine by syringe driver in 1986 than in 1981. The need for an organized system of postgraduate training in terminal care is considered. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 27% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 18% |
| Researcher | 2 | 18% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 9% |
| Other | 1 | 9% |
| Other | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 1 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 64% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 27% |
| Unknown | 1 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2024.
All research outputs
#8,537,346
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#2,838
of 4,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,504
of 11,670 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,877 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 11,670 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.