↓ Skip to main content

Arteriotomy Closure Devices for Cardiovascular Procedures

Overview of attention for article published in Circulation, October 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
guideline
3 clinical guideline sources

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Arteriotomy Closure Devices for Cardiovascular Procedures
Published in
Circulation, October 2010
DOI 10.1161/cir.0b013e3181f9b345
Pubmed ID
Authors

Manesh R. Patel, Hani Jneid, Colin P. Derdeyn, Lloyd W. Klein, Glenn N. Levine, Robert A. Lookstein, Christopher J. White, Yerem Yeghiazarians, Kenneth Rosenfield, on behalf of the American Heart Association Diagnostic and Interventional Cardiac Catheterization Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention Council on Peripheral Vascular Disease Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia and Stroke Council

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Portugal 1 2%
Israel 1 2%
Egypt 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 49 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 7 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 13%
Researcher 6 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Other 17 32%
Unknown 5 9%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 70%
Neuroscience 3 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Engineering 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2017.
All research outputs
#4,046,373
of 27,976,776 outputs
Outputs from Circulation
#9,184
of 25,435 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,585
of 118,002 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation
#77
of 174 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,976,776 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,435 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 118,002 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 174 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.