↓ Skip to main content

Mechanisms of DNA Recombination and Genome Rearrangements: Methods to Study Homologous Recombination, Volume 600

Overview of attention for book
Mechanisms of DNA Recombination and Genome Rearrangements: Methods to Study Homologous Recombination…
Academic Press
Attention for Chapter: Methods to Study DNA End Resection II: Biochemical Reconstitution Assays
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Chapter title
Methods to Study DNA End Resection II: Biochemical Reconstitution Assays
Book title
Mechanisms of DNA Recombination and Genome Rearrangements: Methods to Study Homologous Recombination
Published in
Methods in enzymology, January 2018
DOI 10.1016/bs.mie.2017.11.009
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-0-12-814429-9
Authors

Cosimo Pinto, Roopesh Anand, Petr Cejka

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 24%
Researcher 6 13%
Student > Master 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Librarian 2 4%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 12 26%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 22%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Chemistry 2 4%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 13 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2020.
All research outputs
#7,587,641
of 23,136,540 outputs
Outputs from Methods in enzymology
#689
of 2,610 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,938
of 442,870 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in enzymology
#33
of 149 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,136,540 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,610 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,870 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 149 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.