You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Migratory goose arrival time plays a larger role in influencing forage quality than advancing springs in an Arctic coastal wetland
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0213037 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Karen H. Beard, Ryan T. Choi, A. Joshua Leffler, Lindsay G. Carlson, Katharine C. Kelsey, Joel A. Schmutz, Jeffrey M. Welker |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 50% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 27 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 7% |
| Professor | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 11 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 7 | 26% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 22% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 10 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2019.
All research outputs
#12,928,373
of 23,136,540 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#101,456
of 197,469 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,040
of 351,875 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,468
of 2,991 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,136,540 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 197,469 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,875 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,991 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.