↓ Skip to main content

Pulmonary Function Tests Do Not Predict Pulmonary Complications After Thoracoscopic Lobectomy

Overview of attention for article published in The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, April 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
guideline
4 clinical guideline sources

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Pulmonary Function Tests Do Not Predict Pulmonary Complications After Thoracoscopic Lobectomy
Published in
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, April 2010
DOI 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.12.065
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Czechia 1 1%
Unknown 77 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 11%
Researcher 9 11%
Student > Postgraduate 9 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 10%
Other 7 9%
Other 16 20%
Unknown 21 27%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 51 65%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 1%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 21 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2025.
All research outputs
#2,915,409
of 33,087,078 outputs
Outputs from The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
#591
of 11,983 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,718
of 139,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
#1
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,087,078 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,983 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 139,377 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.