↓ Skip to main content

Association of Chromosome 9p21 with Subsequent Coronary Heart Disease Events: A GENIUS-CHD Study of Individual Participant Data

Overview of attention for article published in Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users

Readers on

mendeley
113 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Association of Chromosome 9p21 with Subsequent Coronary Heart Disease Events: A GENIUS-CHD Study of Individual Participant Data
Published in
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine, March 2019
DOI 10.1161/circgen.119.002471
Pubmed ID
Authors

Riyaz S. Patel, Amand F. Schmidt, Vinicius Tragante, Raymond O. McCubrey, Michael V. Holmes, Laurence J. Howe, Kenan Direk, Axel Åkerblom, Karin Leander, Salim S. Virani, Karol A. Kaminski, Jochen D. Muehlschlegel, Marie-Pierre Dubé, Hooman Allayee, Peter Almgren, Maris Alver, Ekaterina V. Baranova, Hassan Behlouli, Bram Boeckx, Peter S. Braund, Lutz P. Breitling, Graciela Delgado, Nubia E. Duarte, Line Dufresne, Niclas Eriksson, Luisa Foco, Crystel M. Gijsberts, Yan Gong, Jaana Hartiala, Mahyar Heydarpour, Jaroslav A. Hubacek, Marcus Kleber, Daniel Kofink, Pekka Kuukasjärvi, Vei-Vei Lee, Andreas Leiherer, Petra A. Lenzini, Daniel Levin, Leo-Pekka Lyytikäinen, Nicola Martinelli, Ute Mons, Christopher P. Nelson, Kjell Nikus, Anna P. Pilbrow, Rafal Ploski, Yan V. Sun, Michael W.T. Tanck, W.H. Wilson Tang, Stella Trompet, Sander W. van der Laan, Jessica Van Setten, Ragnar O. Vilmundarson, Chiara Viviani Anselmi, Efthymia Vlachopoulou, Eric Boerwinkle, Carlo Briguori, John F. Carlquist, Kathryn F. Carruthers, Gavino Casu, John Deanfield, Panos Deloukas, Frank Dudbridge, Natalie Fitzpatrick, Bruna Gigante, Stefan James, Marja-Liisa Lokki, Paulo A. Lotufo, Nicola Marziliano, Ify R. Mordi, Joseph B. Muhlestein, Chris Newton Cheh, Jan Pitha, Christoph H. Saely, Ayman Samman-Tahhan, Pratik B. Sandesara, Andrej Teren, Adam Timmis, Frans Van de Werf, Els Wauters, Arthur A.M. Wilde, Ian Ford, David J. Stott, Ale Algra, Maria G. Andreassi, Diego Ardissino, Benoit J. Arsenault, Christie M. Ballantyne, Thomas O. Bergmeijer, Connie R. Bezzina, Simon C. Body, Peter Bogaty, Gert J. de Borst, Hermann Brenner, Ralph Burkhardt, Clara Carpeggiani, Gianluigi Condorelli, Rhonda M. Cooper-DeHoff, Sharon Cresci, Ulf de Faire, Robert N. Doughty, Heinz Drexel, James C. Engert, Keith A.A. Fox, Domenico Girelli, Emil Hagström, Stanley L. Hazen, Claes Held, Harry Hemingway, Imo E. Hoefer, G. Kees Hovingh, Julie A. Johnson, Pim A. de Jong, J. Wouter Jukema, Marcin P. Kaczor, Mika Kähönen, Jiri Kettner, Marek Kiliszek, Olaf H. Klungel, Bo Lagerqvist, Diether Lambrechts, Jari O. Laurikka, Terho Lehtimäki, Daniel Lindholm, B.K. Mahmoodi, Anke H. Maitland-van der Zee, Ruth McPherson, Olle Melander, Andres Metspalu, Witold Pepinski, Oliviero Olivieri, Grzegorz Opolski, Colin N. Palmer, Gerard Pasterkamp, Carl J. Pepine, Alexandre C. Pereira, Louise Pilote, Arshed A. Quyyumi, A. Mark Richards, Marek Sanak, Markus Scholz, Agneta Siegbahn, Juha Sinisalo, J. Gustav Smith, John A. Spertus, Alexandre F.R. Stewart, Wojciech Szczeklik, Anna Szpakowicz, Jurriën M. ten Berg, George Thanassoulis, Joachim Thiery, Yolanda van der Graaf, Frank L.J. Visseren, Johannes Waltenberger, CARDIoGRAMPlusC4D Consortium, Pim Van der Harst, Jean-Claude Tardif, Naveed Sattar, Chim C. Lang, Guillaume Pare, James M. Brophy, Jeffrey L. Anderson, Winfried März, Lars Wallentin, Vicky A. Cameron, Benjamin D. Horne, Nilesh J. Samani, Aroon D. Hingorani, Folkert W. Asselbergs

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 113 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 17 15%
Researcher 13 12%
Other 8 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 5%
Student > Master 6 5%
Other 18 16%
Unknown 45 40%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 9 8%
Unknown 50 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2022.
All research outputs
#7,248,185
of 34,575,175 outputs
Outputs from Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
#430
of 1,228 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,559
of 391,396 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
#6
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,575,175 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,228 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 391,396 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.