↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
13 patents

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Clinical and angiographic efficacy of a self-expanding nitinol stent in saphenous vein graft atherosclerotic disease: the Stent Comparative Restenosis (SCORES) Saphenous Vein Graft Registry
Published in
American Heart Journal, May 2003
DOI 10.1016/s0002-8703(03)00020-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

David E Kandzari, Shelley Goldberg, Robert S Schwartz, Marilyn Chazin-Caldie, Michael H Sketch, SCORES SVG Registry Investigators

Abstract

The Stent Comparative Restenosis (SCORES) Saphenous Vein Graft (SVG) Registry was a multicenter, prospective registry designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a self-expanding, nickel-titanium (nitinol) stent for de novo SVG lesions. In all, 159 patients with de novo vein graft lesions > or =2.75 and < or =4.25 mm in diameter and <30 mm in length underwent stenting with the Radius self-expanding stent. The primary end point was target vessel failure (TVF) at 9 months, which was defined as a composite of procedural failure, death, myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization. Procedural success was achieved in 96.8% of patients, and the 30-day incidence of major adverse cardiac events was 2.5%. The binary rate of restenosis at 6 months was 28.6%. By 9 months, the rate of TVF was 24.5%, and the rate of major adverse cardiac events was 23.1%. The 9-month Kaplan-Meier survival rates for freedom from TVF and target lesion revascularization were 76.0% and 87.9%, respectively. No clinical or angiographic characteristic was predictive of restenosis. In de novo atherosclerotic SVG disease, the use of a self-expanding, nitinol stent was associated with high initial procedural success and favorable early and intermediate outcomes. Because few studies have examined the influence of stent composition and design in SVG disease, these findings not only show the safety and efficacy of this self-expanding stent in de novo SVG disease, but also merit further comparison with balloon-expandable stents.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 30%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 10%
Student > Master 1 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 10%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 30%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 40%
Environmental Science 1 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 10%
Social Sciences 1 10%
Unknown 3 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2015.
All research outputs
#6,589,825
of 30,598,342 outputs
Outputs from American Heart Journal
#2,340
of 7,518 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,270
of 66,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Heart Journal
#6
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 30,598,342 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,518 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 66,660 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.