↓ Skip to main content

The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: Baseline Factors That Predict the Onset of Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Ophthalmology, June 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#26 of 3,675)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
10 news outlets
twitter
2 X users
patent
5 patents
reddit
2 Redditors
guideline
5 clinical guideline sources
podcasts
1 podcast

Readers on

mendeley
856 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: Baseline Factors That Predict the Onset of Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma
Published in
Archives of Ophthalmology, June 2002
DOI 10.1001/archopht.120.6.714
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 856 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 848 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 84 10%
Researcher 82 10%
Student > Master 73 9%
Student > Postgraduate 71 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 70 8%
Other 174 20%
Unknown 302 35%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 330 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 48 6%
Engineering 33 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 3%
Neuroscience 23 3%
Other 69 8%
Unknown 327 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 103. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2025.
All research outputs
#519,830
of 34,457,357 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Ophthalmology
#26
of 3,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#409
of 177,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Ophthalmology
#2
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,457,357 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,675 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,142 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.