↓ Skip to main content

Age at Onset in Two Common Neurodegenerative Diseases Is Genetically Controlled

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Human Genetics, March 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

patent
8 patents

Readers on

mendeley
128 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Age at Onset in Two Common Neurodegenerative Diseases Is Genetically Controlled
Published in
American Journal of Human Genetics, March 2002
DOI 10.1086/339815
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To identify genes influencing age at onset (AAO) in two common neurodegenerative diseases, a genomic screen was performed for AAO in families with Alzheimer disease (AD; n=449) and Parkinson disease (PD; n=174). Heritabilities between 40%--60% were found in both the AD and PD data sets. For PD, significant evidence for linkage to AAO was found on chromosome 1p (LOD = 3.41). For AD, the AAO effect of APOE (LOD = 3.28) was confirmed. In addition, evidence for AAO linkage on chromosomes 6 and 10 was identified independently in both the AD and PD data sets. Subsequent unified analyses of these regions identified a single peak on chromosome 10q between D10S1239 and D10S1237, with a maximum LOD score of 2.62. These data suggest that a common gene affects AAO in these two common complex neurodegenerative diseases.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Spain 2 2%
France 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Unknown 124 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 30 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 19%
Other 18 14%
Professor 9 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 5%
Other 19 15%
Unknown 21 16%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 36 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 13%
Neuroscience 12 9%
Chemistry 3 2%
Other 15 12%
Unknown 24 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2012.
All research outputs
#7,639,012
of 34,545,128 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Human Genetics
#3,554
of 7,837 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,553
of 71,102 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Human Genetics
#25
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,545,128 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,837 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.7. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 71,102 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.