↓ Skip to main content

Demographic and Health Characteristics of Elderly Smokers: Results from Established Populations for Epidemiologic Studies of the Elderly

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Preventive Medicine, March 1990
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Demographic and Health Characteristics of Elderly Smokers: Results from Established Populations for Epidemiologic Studies of the Elderly
Published in
American Journal of Preventive Medicine, March 1990
DOI 10.1016/s0749-3797(18)31026-2
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Although smoking has been shown to be associated with excess morbidity and mortality, most studies have focused on young and middle-aged rather than elderly smokers. We examined the demographic characteristics and physical and psychological health of elderly cigarette smokers in four population-based studies (N = 3,673, 3,811, 2,811, and 4,165) of persons 65 years of age and older. Although there was substantial geographic variation in the percentages of smokers, the demographic and health characteristics of smokers were similar across the sites. Most women had never smoked, but most men were former or current smokers. The percentage of never smokers was highest in the "oldest old." Among the elderly ever smokers, men were more likely to have quit than women, and the relative percentage of former smokers increased with age. Current smokers were generally more likely to consume alcohol than never smokers. In this age group, cigarette smoking was typically associated with higher rates of physical disease and symptoms, poorer self-perceived health status, and higher levels of depressive symptoms. Based on these four large geographically diverse population surveys, cigarette smoking remains an important health burden and public health challenge among the elderly.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 7%
Unknown 13 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 43%
Student > Postgraduate 2 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 14%
Unknown 4 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 7%
Psychology 1 7%
Unknown 6 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2006.
All research outputs
#9,516,131
of 27,788,362 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Preventive Medicine
#3,604
of 5,519 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,470
of 17,286 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Preventive Medicine
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,788,362 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,519 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 42.7. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 17,286 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.