↓ Skip to main content

Non-small cell lung cancer.

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (JNCCN), October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Non-small cell lung cancer.
Published in
Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (JNCCN), October 2012
DOI 10.6004/jnccn.2012.0130
Pubmed ID
Authors

David S Ettinger, Wallace Akerley, Hossein Borghaei, Andrew C Chang, Richard T Cheney, Lucian R Chirieac, Thomas A D'Amico, Todd L Demmy, Apar Kishor P Ganti, Ramaswamy Govindan, Frederic W Grannis, Leora Horn, Thierry M Jahan, Mohammad Jahanzeb, Anne Kessinger, Ritsuko Komaki, Feng-Ming Kong, Mark G Kris, Lee M Krug, Inga T Lennes, Billy W Loo, Renato Martins, Janis O'Malley, Raymond U Osarogiagbon, Gregory A Otterson, Jyoti D Patel, Mary C Pinder-Schenck, Katherine M Pisters, Karen Reckamp, Gregory J Riely, Eric Rohren, Scott J Swanson, Douglas E Wood, Stephen C Yang, Miranda Hughes, Kristina M Gregory

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Portugal 2 2%
Japan 1 1%
Unknown 80 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 9 11%
Student > Bachelor 9 11%
Student > Master 7 8%
Researcher 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 16 19%
Unknown 30 36%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 23%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 36 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2018.
All research outputs
#12,440,152
of 34,559,526 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (JNCCN)
#1,275
of 2,293 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,423
of 229,562 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (JNCCN)
#7
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,559,526 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,293 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.4. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,562 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.