↓ Skip to main content

Head and neck cancers, Version 2.2014. Clinical practice guidelines in oncology.

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (JNCCN), October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
guideline
2 clinical guideline sources

Readers on

mendeley
126 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Head and neck cancers, Version 2.2014. Clinical practice guidelines in oncology.
Published in
Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (JNCCN), October 2014
DOI 10.6004/jnccn.2014.0142
Pubmed ID
Authors

David G Pfister, Sharon Spencer, David M Brizel, Barbara Burtness, Paul M Busse, Jimmy J Caudell, Anthony J Cmelak, A Dimitrios Colevas, Frank Dunphy, David W Eisele, Jill Gilbert, Maura L Gillison, Robert I Haddad, Bruce H Haughey, Wesley L Hicks, Ying J Hitchcock, Antonio Jimeno, Merrill S Kies, William M Lydiatt, Ellie Maghami, Renato Martins, Thomas McCaffrey, Loren K Mell, Bharat B Mittal, Harlan A Pinto, John A Ridge, Cristina P Rodriguez, Sandeep Samant, David E Schuller, Jatin P Shah, Randal S Weber, Gregory T Wolf, Frank Worden, Sue S Yom, Nicole R McMillian, Miranda Hughes

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Unknown 124 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 13%
Researcher 14 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 10%
Student > Bachelor 8 6%
Professor 8 6%
Other 26 21%
Unknown 41 33%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 50 40%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Engineering 3 2%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 47 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2021.
All research outputs
#4,281,824
of 34,518,147 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (JNCCN)
#607
of 2,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,609
of 300,846 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (JNCCN)
#4
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,518,147 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,290 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,846 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.