↓ Skip to main content

Local adaptation across a climatic gradient despite small effective population size in the rare sapphire rockcress

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, August 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (58th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
224 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Local adaptation across a climatic gradient despite small effective population size in the rare sapphire rockcress
Published in
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, August 2001
DOI 10.1098/rspb.2001.1715
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 224 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 9 4%
Germany 3 1%
Brazil 3 1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Other 4 2%
Unknown 199 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 52 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 49 22%
Professor 19 8%
Student > Master 18 8%
Student > Bachelor 16 7%
Other 36 16%
Unknown 34 15%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 136 61%
Environmental Science 31 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 1%
Chemical Engineering 1 <1%
Other 4 2%
Unknown 38 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2024.
All research outputs
#10,790,034
of 34,545,128 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#8,558
of 12,428 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,596
of 60,520 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#26
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,545,128 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,428 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.4. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 60,520 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.