↓ Skip to main content

No genetic association between the LRP receptor and sporadic or late-onset familial Alzheimer disease

Overview of attention for article published in neurogenetics, March 1998
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
No genetic association between the LRP receptor and sporadic or late-onset familial Alzheimer disease
Published in
neurogenetics, March 1998
DOI 10.1007/s100480050026
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein gene (LRP1) is often mentioned as a candidate gene for Alzheimer disease (AD) because of its role as a receptor for apolipoprotein E (apoE), a major genetic risk factor for late-onset familial and sporadic AD. A recent association study of a tetranucleotide repeat polymorphism located 5' to the LRP1 gene detected an increase in the 87 base pair allele in AD cases compared to unaffected controls. Additionally, an independent study involving a genomic screen for genes associated with late-onset AD identified a region as a possible location of a late-onset AD gene on chromosome 12p between D12S373 and D12S390, about 10 cM proximal to LRP1. We examined 144 late-onset multiplex AD families, 436 sporadic AD cases, and 240 controls and found no evidence of linkage or association of LRP1 and AD. Our data indicate that genetic variation of the LRP1 gene is not a major risk factor in the etiology of AD.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 30%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 17%
Student > Bachelor 3 13%
Professor 3 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 13%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 2 9%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 26%
Neuroscience 5 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 9%
Computer Science 2 9%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 3 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2010.
All research outputs
#12,358,651
of 34,410,798 outputs
Outputs from neurogenetics
#199
of 489 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,545
of 46,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age from neurogenetics
#4
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,798 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 489 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 46,151 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.