↓ Skip to main content

Serial MR Imaging of Annular Tears in Lumbar Intervertebral Disks.

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Neuroradiology, August 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Serial MR Imaging of Annular Tears in Lumbar Intervertebral Disks.
Published in
American Journal of Neuroradiology, August 2002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fletcher M Munter, Bruce A Wasserman, Hsiu-Mei Wu, David M Yousem

Abstract

Annular tears of lumbar intervertebral disks are found in both symptomatic and asymptomatic persons; therefore, it is difficult to determine whether these findings indicate acute abnormality. Our purpose was to determine whether the MR imaging findings of tears (ie, hyperintensity and contrast enhancement) of the annulus fibrosus persist or resolve over time. A radiologic database was searched for spinal MR imaging examinations noting annular tears. Eighteen patients were identified who had undergone more than one spinal MR imaging study. The images were reviewed for presence or absence of annular tears, defined as an area of hyperintensity on T2-weighted images or enhancement in the posterior annulus, separate from the nucleus pulposus. Annular tears were observed at 29 levels in 18 patients. Two tears developed during the follow-up interval. When contrast-enhanced images were obtained during serial examinations, 10 (100%) of 10 enhancing annular tears persisted on the follow-up contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images (mean interval, 17.2 months; SD, 12.3 months). High signal intensity on T2-weighted MR images was noted in 26 (96%) of 27 tears initially and persisted in 23 (88%) of 26 (mean interval, 21.9 months; SD, 15.0 months). Hyperintensity on T2-weighted MR images and enhancement of annular tears could not be used to determine the tears' acuity over the range of follow-up provided in this study.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 2%
South Africa 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 50 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 25%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 15%
Student > Master 7 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 7%
Other 4 7%
Other 17 31%
Unknown 1 2%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 78%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Engineering 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 2 4%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2023.
All research outputs
#19,437,694
of 24,754,593 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Neuroradiology
#4,287
of 5,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,567
of 46,790 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Neuroradiology
#6
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,754,593 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,148 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 46,790 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.