↓ Skip to main content

Antecedents of adult interpersonal functioning: Effects of individual differences in age 3 temperament.

Overview of attention for article published in Developmental Psychology, January 1997
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Antecedents of adult interpersonal functioning: Effects of individual differences in age 3 temperament.
Published in
Developmental Psychology, January 1997
DOI 10.1037//0012-1649.33.2.206
Pubmed ID
Authors

Denise L. Newman, Avshalom Caspi, Terrie E. Moffitt, Phil A. Silva

Abstract

We examined whether temperamental differences at age 3 are linked to interpersonal functioning in young adulthood. In a sample of over 900 children, we identified 5 distinct groups of children based on behavioral observations: Well-adjusted, undercontrolled, reserved, confident, and inhibited. At age 21, we assessed the children's interpersonal functioning in 4 social contexts: in the social network, at home, in romantic relationships, and at work. We found three patterns of relations: (a) Well-adjusted, reserved, and confident children defined a heterogeneous range of normative adult interpersonal behavior, (b) inhibited children had lower levels of social support but normative adjustment in romantic relationships and at work, and (c) undercontrolled children had lower levels of adjustment and greater interpersonal conflict across adult social contexts.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 28%
Student > Bachelor 4 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 12%
Student > Master 3 12%
Researcher 2 8%
Other 5 20%
Unknown 1 4%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 15 60%
Social Sciences 3 12%
Arts and Humanities 2 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2011.
All research outputs
#7,015,563
of 32,332,113 outputs
Outputs from Developmental Psychology
#1,185
of 4,779 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,063
of 117,736 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Developmental Psychology
#15
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,332,113 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,779 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 117,736 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.