↓ Skip to main content

Why the Rat-1 Fibroblast Should Replace the SCN as the In Vitro Model of Choice

Overview of attention for article published in Cell, June 1998
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Why the Rat-1 Fibroblast Should Replace the SCN as the In Vitro Model of Choice
Published in
Cell, June 1998
DOI 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81197-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 6%
Unknown 45 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 21%
Student > Bachelor 7 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 15%
Other 5 10%
Professor 4 8%
Other 13 27%
Unknown 2 4%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 40%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 29%
Neuroscience 3 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 4%
Philosophy 1 2%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 5 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2022.
All research outputs
#19,154,203
of 27,774,969 outputs
Outputs from Cell
#16,911
of 17,857 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,305
of 37,754 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell
#105
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,774,969 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,857 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 61.9. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 37,754 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.