↓ Skip to main content

Moderate Pressure is Essential for Massage Therapy Effects

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Neuroscience, April 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#24 of 1,486)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
217 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Moderate Pressure is Essential for Massage Therapy Effects
Published in
International Journal of Neuroscience, April 2010
DOI 10.3109/00207450903579475
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Moderate pressure appears to be necessary for massage therapy effects. Studies comparing moderate and light pressure massage are reviewed and they suggest that growth and development are enhanced in infants and stress is reduced in adults, but only by moderate pressure massage. The stimulation of pressure receptors leads to increased vagal activity which, in turn, seems to mediate the diverse benefits noted for massage therapy.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 217 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 211 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 34 16%
Student > Bachelor 27 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 11%
Other 16 7%
Professor 10 5%
Other 44 20%
Unknown 63 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 40 18%
Psychology 21 10%
Neuroscience 12 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 4%
Other 25 12%
Unknown 66 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2023.
All research outputs
#994,339
of 29,839,249 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Neuroscience
#24
of 1,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,757
of 119,504 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Neuroscience
#2
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,839,249 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,504 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.