↓ Skip to main content

Endoscopic ultrasound and computer tomography are inaccurate methods of classifying cystic pancreatic lesions

Overview of attention for article published in Digestive and Liver Disease, November 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Endoscopic ultrasound and computer tomography are inaccurate methods of classifying cystic pancreatic lesions
Published in
Digestive and Liver Disease, November 2005
DOI 10.1016/j.dld.2005.09.023
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
France 1 9%
Unknown 10 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 27%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 9%
Researcher 1 9%
Student > Postgraduate 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 36%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 64%
Unknown 4 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2021.
All research outputs
#9,515,738
of 27,782,313 outputs
Outputs from Digestive and Liver Disease
#898
of 2,557 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,350
of 172,791 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Digestive and Liver Disease
#8
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,782,313 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,557 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,791 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.