↓ Skip to main content

Syndecan 1 is a critical mediator of macropinocytosis in pancreatic cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
twitter
49 X users
patent
2 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
3 Redditors
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
191 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Syndecan 1 is a critical mediator of macropinocytosis in pancreatic cancer
Published in
Nature, March 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41586-019-1062-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wantong Yao, Johnathon L. Rose, Wei Wang, Sahil Seth, Hong Jiang, Ayumu Taguchi, Jintan Liu, Liang Yan, Avnish Kapoor, Pingping Hou, Ziheng Chen, Qiuyun Wang, Luigi Nezi, Zhaohui Xu, Jun Yao, Baoli Hu, Piergiorgio F. Pettazzoni, I Lin Ho, Ningping Feng, Vandhana Ramamoorthy, Shan Jiang, Pingna Deng, Grace J. Ma, Peter Den, Zhi Tan, Shu Xing Zhang, Huamin Wang, Y. Alan Wang, Angela K. Deem, Jason B. Fleming, Alessandro Carugo, Timothy P. Heffernan, Anirban Maitra, Andrea Viale, Haoqiang Ying, Samir Hanash, Ronald A. DePinho, Giulio F. Draetta

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 191 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 191 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 29 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 15%
Student > Bachelor 14 7%
Student > Master 12 6%
Other 9 5%
Other 25 13%
Unknown 74 39%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 51 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 4%
Chemistry 7 4%
Other 9 5%
Unknown 78 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 57. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2025.
All research outputs
#918,517
of 32,921,030 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#32,170
of 115,361 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,785
of 382,844 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#592
of 1,043 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,921,030 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 115,361 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 96.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 382,844 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,043 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.