↓ Skip to main content

Policy-driven versus Evidence-based Conservation: A Review of Political Targets and Biological Needs

Overview of attention for article published in AIBS Bulletin, November 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
4 policy sources
twitter
9 X users

Readers on

mendeley
450 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Policy-driven versus Evidence-based Conservation: A Review of Political Targets and Biological Needs
Published in
AIBS Bulletin, November 2005
DOI 10.1641/0006-3568(2005)055[0989:pvecar]2.0.co;2
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 450 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 9 2%
Brazil 6 1%
Finland 4 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Thailand 1 <1%
Other 7 2%
Unknown 413 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 109 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 79 18%
Student > Master 60 13%
Other 32 7%
Student > Bachelor 31 7%
Other 82 18%
Unknown 57 13%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 166 37%
Environmental Science 157 35%
Social Sciences 16 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 11 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 <1%
Other 22 5%
Unknown 74 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2021.
All research outputs
#2,539,466
of 34,409,383 outputs
Outputs from AIBS Bulletin
#106
of 478 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,108
of 107,602 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AIBS Bulletin
#5
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,409,383 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 478 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,602 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.