You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Macondo‐1 well oil‐derived polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in mesozooplankton from the northern Gulf of Mexico
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Geophysical Research Letters, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1029/2011gl049505 |
| Authors |
Siddhartha Mitra, David G. Kimmel, Jessica Snyder, Kimberly Scalise, Benjamin D. McGlaughon, Michael R. Roman, Ginger L. Jahn, James J. Pierson, Stephen B. Brandt, Joseph P. Montoya, Robert J. Rosenbauer, Thomas D. Lorenson, Florence L. Wong, Pamela L. Campbell |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 3% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 95 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 23 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 17% |
| Other | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 14 | 14% |
| Unknown | 13 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 28 | 27% |
| Environmental Science | 20 | 20% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 19 | 19% |
| Chemistry | 6 | 6% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Unknown | 19 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2021.
All research outputs
#1,083,884
of 24,712,008 outputs
Outputs from Geophysical Research Letters
#2,157
of 20,829 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,871
of 253,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geophysical Research Letters
#11
of 127 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,712,008 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,829 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,044 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 127 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.