↓ Skip to main content

The Structure and Function of γс-Dependent Cytokines and Receptors: Regulation of T Lymphocyte Development and Homeostasis

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Reviews™ in Immunology, January 1998
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
10 patents

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The Structure and Function of γс-Dependent Cytokines and Receptors: Regulation of T Lymphocyte Development and Homeostasis
Published in
Critical Reviews™ in Immunology, January 1998
DOI 10.1615/critrevimmunol.v18.i6.20
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Five cytokines, IL-2, IL-4, IL-7, IL-9, and IL-15, form one group that is characterized by utilizing the common gamma chain (gamma c) as a receptor subunit. Examination of the phenotype of various cytokine or cytokine receptor "knockout" mice demonstrates that these cytokines are critical for normal lymphocyte development and subsequent functional activity of the peripheral immune compartment. This review summarizes the structural and functional properties of each of these five cytokines and their receptors, including the known redundant pathways for each cytokine or receptor. The contribution of these cytokines and receptors will then be considered in detail with respect to regulation of T lymphocyte development and homeostasis of the peripheral T cell compartment.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 8%
Unknown 12 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 15%
Student > Master 2 15%
Librarian 1 8%
Student > Postgraduate 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 31%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 15%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 8%
Unknown 5 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2009.
All research outputs
#5,141,086
of 34,365,356 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews™ in Immunology
#56
of 430 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,761
of 132,316 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews™ in Immunology
#3
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,365,356 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 430 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 132,316 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.