↓ Skip to main content

Cerebral Cortical Circuitry Formation Requires Functional Glycine Receptors

Overview of attention for article published in Cerebral Cortex, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Cerebral Cortical Circuitry Formation Requires Functional Glycine Receptors
Published in
Cerebral Cortex, February 2016
DOI 10.1093/cercor/bhw025
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The development of the cerebral cortex is a complex process that requires the generation, migration, and differentiation of neurons. Interfering with any of these steps can impair the establishment of connectivity and, hence, function of the adult brain. Neurotransmitter receptors have emerged as critical players to regulate these biological steps during brain maturation. Among them, α2 subunit-containing glycine receptors (GlyRs) regulate cortical neurogenesis and the present work demonstrates the long-term consequences of their genetic disruption on neuronal connectivity in the postnatal cerebral cortex. Our data indicate that somatosensory cortical neurons of Glra2 knockout mice (Glra2KO) have more dendritic branches with an overall increase in total spine number. These morphological defects correlate with a disruption of the excitation/inhibition balance, thereby increasing network excitability and enhancing susceptibility to epileptic seizures after pentylenetetrazol tail infusion. Taken together, our findings show that the loss of embryonic GlyRα2 ultimately impairs the formation of cortical circuits in the mature brain.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 46 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 23%
Student > Bachelor 7 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 13%
Student > Master 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 12 26%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 15 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 9%
Psychology 3 6%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 11 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2016.
All research outputs
#15,361,255
of 22,851,489 outputs
Outputs from Cerebral Cortex
#3,533
of 4,798 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#176,554
of 297,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cerebral Cortex
#72
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,851,489 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,798 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 297,955 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.