↓ Skip to main content

When Therapist Estimations of the Process of Treatment Can Predict Patients Rating On Outcome: The Case of the Working Alliance

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
When Therapist Estimations of the Process of Treatment Can Predict Patients Rating On Outcome: The Case of the Working Alliance
Published in
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, April 2018
DOI 10.1037/ccp0000293
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 59 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 17%
Student > Bachelor 8 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Researcher 3 5%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 21 36%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 26 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 7%
Social Sciences 4 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 23 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2018.
All research outputs
#22,256,295
of 27,244,486 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
#4,537
of 4,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#273,528
of 347,811 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
#14
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,244,486 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,688 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,811 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.