↓ Skip to main content

Operational Constraints on the Mental Rotation of STEM Representations

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Educational Psychology, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
110 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Operational Constraints on the Mental Rotation of STEM Representations
Published in
Journal of Educational Psychology, November 2018
DOI 10.1037/edu0000258
Authors

Mike Stieff, Andrea Origenes, Dane DeSutter, Matthew Lira, Lukas Banevicius, Dylan Tabang, Gervacio Cabel

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 110 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 12 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 8%
Student > Master 7 6%
Student > Bachelor 5 5%
Other 16 15%
Unknown 51 46%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 18 16%
Psychology 11 10%
Social Sciences 9 8%
Arts and Humanities 4 4%
Mathematics 3 3%
Other 10 9%
Unknown 55 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2018.
All research outputs
#17,866,944
of 27,809,264 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Educational Psychology
#1,524
of 2,693 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#214,706
of 366,665 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Educational Psychology
#11
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,809,264 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,693 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,665 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.