↓ Skip to main content

Rad52 prevents excessive replication fork reversal and protects from nascent strand degradation

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
20 X users

Readers on

mendeley
172 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Rad52 prevents excessive replication fork reversal and protects from nascent strand degradation
Published in
Nature Communications, March 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41467-019-09196-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 172 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 172 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 32 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 16%
Student > Master 14 8%
Student > Bachelor 12 7%
Student > Postgraduate 10 6%
Other 22 13%
Unknown 55 32%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 74 43%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 1%
Computer Science 2 1%
Other 4 2%
Unknown 62 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2019.
All research outputs
#3,544,053
of 32,606,541 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#40,486
of 78,620 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,948
of 380,879 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#821
of 1,358 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,606,541 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 78,620 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 50.0. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 380,879 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,358 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.