Cognitive and cerebral hemodynamic effects of endovascular recanalization of chronically occluded cervical internal carotid artery: single-center study and review of the literature.
In BriefThe authors performed the first literature review and pilot study with aggregate pooled statistics on patients with symptomatic, medically refractory, chronically occluded cervical internal carotid artery (COICA). Results suggested that endovascular and hybrid (carotid endarterectomy plus endovascular) techniques are safe procedures to revascularize patients with symptomatic COICA in whom conservative management has failed. Moreover, CT perfusion imaging parameters were associated with neurocognitive improvement after surgery and can be used as radiological markers to assess cerebral hemodynamics in such patients.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2023.
All research outputs
#3,707,525
of 34,411,289 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurosurgery
#1,088
of 8,770 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,118
of 391,376 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurosurgery
#32
of 138 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,411,289 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,770 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 391,376 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 138 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
