↓ Skip to main content

Catalyzing Transcriptomics Research in Cardiovascular Disease: The CardioRNA COST Action CA17129

Overview of attention for article published in Non-Coding RNA, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#26 of 359)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
18 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Catalyzing Transcriptomics Research in Cardiovascular Disease: The CardioRNA COST Action CA17129
Published in
Non-Coding RNA, March 2019
DOI 10.3390/ncrna5020031
Pubmed ID
Authors

Clarissa Pedrosa da C Gomes, Bence Ágg, Andrejaana Andova, Serdal Arslan, Andrew Baker, Monika Barteková, Dimitris Beis, Fay Betsou, Stephanie Bezzina Wettinger, Branko Bugarski, Gianluigi Condorelli, Gustavo José Justo da Silva, Sabrina Danilin, David de Gonzalo-Calvo, Alfonso Buil, Maria Carmo-Fonseca, Francisco J Enguita, Kyriacos Felekkis, Peter Ferdinandy, Mariann Gyöngyösi, Matthias Hackl, Kanita Karaduzovic-Hadziabdic, Jan Hellemans, Stephane Heymans, Markéta Hlavackova, Morten Andre Hoydal, Aleksandra Jankovic, Amela Jusic, Dimitris Kardassis, Risto Kerkelä, Gabriela M Kuster, Päivi Lakkisto, Przemyslaw Leszek, Mitja Lustrek, Lars Maegdefessel, Fabio Martelli, Susana Novella, Timothy O'Brien, Christos Papaneophytou, Thierry Pedrazzini, Florence Pinet, Octavian Popescu, Ines Potočnjak, Emma Robinson, Shlomo Sasson, Markus Scholz, Maya Simionescu, Monika Stoll, Zoltan V Varga, Manlio Vinciguerra, Angela Xuereb, Mehmet Birhan Yilmaz, Costanza Emanueli, Yvan Devaux, on behalf of the EU-CardioRNA COST Action (CA17129)

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 78 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 9%
Student > Master 6 8%
Other 5 6%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Other 14 18%
Unknown 30 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 12%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Computer Science 2 3%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 41 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2020.
All research outputs
#2,903,907
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Non-Coding RNA
#26
of 359 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,117
of 367,459 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Non-Coding RNA
#4
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 359 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,459 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.