↓ Skip to main content

The Faunistic Composition of Frogs Corresponding to the Rice Fields with Various Conditions in Noubi Plains

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of The Japanese Institute of Landscape Architecture, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Faunistic Composition of Frogs Corresponding to the Rice Fields with Various Conditions in Noubi Plains
Published in
Journal of The Japanese Institute of Landscape Architecture, January 2012
DOI 10.5632/jila.75.415
Authors

Makio TEMPAKU, Satoshi OSAWA, Takehiko KATSUNO

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2023.
All research outputs
#15,739,010
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of The Japanese Institute of Landscape Architecture
#118
of 182 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#161,668
of 250,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of The Japanese Institute of Landscape Architecture
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 182 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,087 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.