↓ Skip to main content

Carbon nanotubes exhibit fibrillar pharmacology in primates

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Carbon nanotubes exhibit fibrillar pharmacology in primates
Published in
PLOS ONE, August 2017
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0183902
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 17%
Researcher 3 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 8%
Professor 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 7 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 13%
Materials Science 3 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 8%
Engineering 2 8%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 7 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2025.
All research outputs
#10,461,777
of 33,992,632 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#89,849
of 222,919 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,684
of 353,944 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,673
of 4,127 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,992,632 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 222,919 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,944 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,127 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.