↓ Skip to main content

Inactivation of E2a in recombinant adenoviruses improves the prospect for gene therapy in cystic fibrosis

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Genetics, July 1994
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
patent
78 patents

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Inactivation of E2a in recombinant adenoviruses improves the prospect for gene therapy in cystic fibrosis
Published in
Nature Genetics, July 1994
DOI 10.1038/ng0794-362
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Although first generation recombinant adenoviruses, deleted of sequences spanning E1a and E1b, have been useful for in vivo applications of gene therapy, expression of the recombinant gene has been transient and often associated with the development of inflammation. We show that with first generation adenovirus-mediated gene transfer to the mouse lung, viral proteins are expressed leading to destructive cellular immune responses and repopulation of the lung with nontransgene containing cells. Second generation E1 deleted viruses further crippled by a temperature sensitive mutation in the E2a gene were associated with substantially longer recombinant gene expression and less inflammation. Stable expression of human CF transmembrane conductance regulator has been achieved in lungs of CF mice instilled with a second generation virus.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Portugal 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 47 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 22%
Researcher 9 18%
Student > Bachelor 8 16%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 8%
Other 3 6%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 8 16%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 34%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 4%
Neuroscience 2 4%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 9 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2026.
All research outputs
#3,689,686
of 33,779,198 outputs
Outputs from Nature Genetics
#4,163
of 8,672 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,665
of 29,609 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Genetics
#13
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,779,198 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,672 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.2. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 29,609 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.