@RickCarlsson @giladfeldman Hard agree! We did that here, with two experiments (one before communicating with authors, one after). Although it was frustrating, it enabled us to see what we could gain from the paper itself in terms of methods, and theref…
@AshleyJ_Thomas @DrVicSimms @AbbieCahoon @UlsterUniPsych Thanks for checking them out!! Yes, that paper is here if you're interested: https://t.co/v32GKq58RZ
@estSchott I reported them here in Experiment 2 (3.2. Results), and explained why I then went on to use BFs to show support for the null: https://t.co/v32GKq58RZ
Gold open access version here: https://t.co/v32GKq58RZ 4/4