You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Consistency of impact assessment protocols for non-native species
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
NeoBiota, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3897/neobiota.44.31650 |
| Authors |
Pablo González-Moreno, Lorenzo Lazzaro, Montserrat Vilà, Cristina Preda, Tim Adriaens, Sven Bacher, Giuseppe Brundu, Gordon H. Copp, Franz Essl, Emili García-Berthou, Stelios Katsanevakis, Toril Loennechen Moen, Frances E. Lucy, Wolfgang Nentwig, Helen E. Roy, Greta Srėbalienė, Venche Talgø, Sonia Vanderhoeven, Ana Andjelković, Kęstutis Arbačiauskas, Marie-Anne Auger-Rozenberg, Mi-Jung Bae, Michel Bariche, Pieter Boets, Mário Boieiro, Paulo Alexandre Borges, João Canning-Clode, Frederico Cardigos, Niki Chartosia, Elizabeth Joanne Cottier-Cook, Fabio Crocetta, Bram D’hondt, Bruno Foggi, Swen Follak, Belinda Gallardo, Øivind Gammelmo, Sylvaine Giakoumi, Claudia Giuliani, Fried Guillaume, Lucija Šerić Jelaska, Jonathan M. Jeschke, Miquel Jover, Alejandro Juárez-Escario, Stefanos Kalogirou, Aleksandra Kočić, Eleni Kytinou, Ciaran Laverty, Vanessa Lozano, Alberto Maceda-Veiga, Elizabete Marchante, Hélia Marchante, Angeliki F. Martinou, Sandro Meyer, Dan Michin, Ana Montero-Castaño, Maria Cristina Morais, Carmen Morales-Rodriguez, Nadia Muhthassim, Zoltán Á. Nagy, Nikica Ogris, Huseyin Onen, Jan Pergl, Riikka Puntila, Wolfgang Rabitsch, Triya Tessa Ramburn, Carla Rego, Fabian Reichenbach, Carmen Romeralo, Wolf-Christian Saul, Gritta Schrader, Rory Sheehan, Predrag Simonović, Marius Skolka, António Onofre Soares, Leif Sundheim, Ali Serhan Tarkan, Rumen Tomov, Elena Tricarico, Konstantinos Tsiamis, Ahmet Uludağ, Johan van Valkenburg, Hugo Verreycken, Anna Maria Vettraino, Lluís Vilar, Øystein Wiig, Johanna Witzell, Andrea Zanetta, Marc Kenis |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 62 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 9 | 15% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 8% |
| Italy | 3 | 5% |
| Belgium | 3 | 5% |
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| Sweden | 2 | 3% |
| Portugal | 2 | 3% |
| Comoros | 2 | 3% |
| Ireland | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 19% |
| Unknown | 20 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 40 | 65% |
| Scientists | 20 | 32% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 140 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 32 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 16% |
| Professor | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 9 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 25 | 18% |
| Unknown | 33 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 39 | 28% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 35 | 25% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Engineering | 3 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 6% |
| Unknown | 48 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 79. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2020.
All research outputs
#552,763
of 25,736,439 outputs
Outputs from NeoBiota
#27
of 541 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,416
of 365,523 outputs
Outputs of similar age from NeoBiota
#1
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,736,439 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 541 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,523 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.